When a month ago we published the latest poll on the home page was in the midst of a very stimulating discussion Blog on the "aesthetic" all ' obesity, on our ability to perceive the identity of others ahead of their dimensionality, shape expectations generated by media and so on. The survey, say The random survey about site visitors and those who arrive via Facebook, then had something provocative to synthesize greatly the terms of that debate. And the results are expressed as a summary of significant interest.
Asked If you see a ciccio / what do you think? 8 people out of more than 100, namely the 7 point something of respondents said "But this sucks!" .
This is a significant percentage of those who participated, and the following people who read this blog and / or post on Facebook, and in this sense is even more interesting, even before worrying. Some will say that tuttosommato are few, a minority, but it is also a minority (12 percent) respondents also "Wow!" to that same question. Altogether about 20 percent of responses.
Why look together? Because these responses emerge still heavy debate on the radicalization of the fatness of humans : If there are people who rewards ciccio / her to appear only on the mere fact of being, just the other side there are those who do expressing an opinion on the same form, those to whom the ciccio / a is "simply" disgusting. To approach or be approached by a major dimensionality, one in five does not express surprise or curiosity that expresses anyone else, actually expresses a feeling, a feeling I'd say almost, extremely accurate. From there for the next part, if any, knowledge of the person. To mitigate this
radicalization is 33 percent of respondents who said they "I do not think anything in particular" , a relative majority which seems to contribute more to the growth of the debate the whole issue. Who said it was questioned and he replied that it had pre-judgments opulence dimensional, which is perhaps the best starting point, of course, to build a more welcoming and stimulating. These votes can be added with a correction of even those of respondents "yum, interesting!" , a response to 22 per cent and that, given the other options, try one who seems to have tickled instinctive attraction to the fat and the butts. This is not a response close to that "Wow" but, in many ways, a position antithetical: rather than being open-mouthed before the ciccio / a, respondents found diversity with respect to identity normoforma an area to be investigated.
speech apart, finally, about those 26 people, as many as 24 percent of the total, who have responded to that question "MioDDIO dimgrisci Oh!" . These people expressing an attitude widespread in society, the fact that it stops here 24 percent is probably due to the specific nature of this blog and in the presence of other response options. In general, it is an attitude that goes beyond the pre-judgment, because it uses the effect to shape a world : This is the approach of those who think the fat should and can lose weight, and if he does is because it can not contain, control or depressed beyond belief, is a loser or one of those many ticks that have been discussed at length. And 'he who receives the complement of the other with that "I see you lost weight" going for more, and that all cicci experience regularly.
Those 26 respondents seem that interested in the complexity, either in understanding the extent of human-sized, long before the psychological than physical, nor to question the slogans of declining media, fashion and dietismi deepening the scientific aspect of the matter. Are interested in synthesizing the whole world that we strive to speak and reduce it to an expression whose primary effect is to create a distance between people, and at the expense of raising their .
hope though, as on this blog have responded to this survey is that among them there are who is prepared to challenge certain determinations. And confront them, as it is happening here in the forums in recent weeks. There is only gain from the discussion of people who do not claim to be right, claim only to increase their understanding of the world. A good feeling is not it?
0 comments:
Post a Comment