few days ago, as usual, zapping between channels, I came across an interesting broadcast where we discussed about privacy the judiciary. The comparison was between a well-known criminal lawyer in Milan and an equally famous journalist belonging to the ranks of so-called "girotondini. In reality, the two partners, while supporting reasons and differing opinions, maintained the tone of debate within the limits of a civil mutual tolerance and therefore also the spectators were able to follow the thread of reasoning, and perhaps form an opinion about it. Starting undeniable statistic that refers to a number of MPs chronically more or less involved in legal proceedings that, according to some (including myself) should take a step back and resign when they participate at any level the exercise of power. They then addressed issues such as the equally fundamental right of everyone to protect his privacy, even if they were found responsible relative with a criminal conviction should prevail with respect to the kind of person who could be called right to oblivion . In this regard we express our point of view because we feel called into question by mechanical biases that significantly hamper our social reintegration. Many of us are aware that they were characters in a negative report unpleasant facts, maybe some 'emphasized by the press and mass media of newspapers, but many, especially after many years and after serving sentences heavy, the desire and need to be forgotten is the starting point for groped to rebuild a normal life and dignity. For this reason we claim our "right to oblivion" condition and a must for those who step immediately after the forced separation from society, it does not suck is a candidate to participate in a reality television show or play games millionaires. However, what interests me is to reiterate the concept that too often we forget that behind any type of offense or crime consumed there are always people who, regardless, are human beings with affection and a private sphere that no one in the right to violate.
Alberto Oldroyd
0 comments:
Post a Comment